Discrimination

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination in employment based on race, color, national origin, religion and sex. The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (1967) extended the prohibition against discrimination to age. In the years since, many states and the federal government barred discrimination based disability, pregnancy, citizenship, genetic information and status as a veteran. The characteristic protected by anti-discrimination law, like sex, age, race and veterans' status, are known as “protected classifications.” People who share those characteristics are in a “protected class.”

Two Types of Discrimination - Disparate Impact and Disparate Treatment

Laws prohibit discriminatory "treatment," where an employer treats employees in a protected class worse those who are not, and discriminatory "impact," where an employer does not intend to discriminate, but uses an otherwise neutral decision-making process that has a discriminatory effect. Examples include a height requirement or skills test that disproportionately screens out members of a protected class, like females, asians or hispanics. Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971). 

Disparate impact discrimination cases are comparatively rare.  Cases involving discriminatory treatment are far more common. Most of MEL's discussion of discrimination involves discriminatory treatment. 

Unlawful Discrimination - the Exception to the Rule

Surprisingly, most forms of employment discrimination are completely lawful. Employers can lawfully prefer a younger applicant with a degree from a prestigious university over an older one from a local state college, if education is what matters. In that case, the employer has a discriminatory motive in favor of a better education, but the motive is rational and legitimate. Even if irrational, employment decisions are not unlawful unless they are motivated by an employee's protected class. An employer could, for example, refuse to hire a 50 year old female Asian born under the sign of Aquarius, because she is an Aquarian. Although irrational, no law prohibits discriminaton based on astrological sign. As long as the employer's decision was not motivated by the employee's age, gender or race, it was lawful. 

Proving Unlawful Motivation

Proving unlawful motivation is not easy. Motive is invisible. We cannot touch or feel what someone thinks. Plus, most discriminators either fail to recognize their discriminatory motive, or are clever enough to conceal it. Consequently, "there will seldom be 'eyewitness' testimony as to the employer's mental processes." United States Postal Serv. Bd. of Governors v. Aikens, 460 U.S. 711, 716, (1983). But when there is it is known as "direct evidence" of discrimination.

Direct Evidence of Discrimination

Direct evidence of discrimination is "that evidence which, if believed, requires the conclusion that unlawful discrimination" motivated the employer's actions. Jacklyn v. Schering-Plough Healthcare Prods. Sales Corp., 176 F.3d 921, 926 (6th Cir. 1999).  Decision-maker statements that qualify as direct evidence include:

  • disparaging remarks about people in the protected class in general ("you can't teach an old salesman how to market with social media")
  • disparaging remarks that relate an individual's protected characteristic, especially as it relates to work ("Tiffany misses too much work because of her son is disabled")
  • remarks reflecting stereotypical views of people in a protected class ("Gretta is so bipolar. I never know what she will do next.")
  • slurs and demeaning jokes based on the protected characterisic ("I would ask you how old you are but I know you forgot how to count that high”)

​Circumstantial Evidence

More commonly, a discrimination claimant has only circumstantial evidence that implies unlawful bias. Kline v. Tenn. Valley Auth., 128 F.3d 337, 348 (6th Cir. 1997) (setting forth the manner in which a plaintiff may prove unlawful discrimination under the ADEA). Circumstantial evidence is proof that does not on its face establish discriminatory animus, but lets a fact finder draw a reasonable inference that discrimination occurred. Kline, 128 F.3d at 348. Circumstantial evidence of bias can include:

  • treatment so unusual, egregious, unjust, or severe as to suggest discrimination,
  • an employer’s history of showing bias toward younger employees,
  • statistically significant differences in the numbers of females and males hired or fired,
  • adverse treatment of workers in the protected classification, but not workers outside of it, and vice versa
  • charges or complaints of similar discriminatory treatment by other members of the protected class, 
  • violation of company policy with regard to protected workers, without justification, and
  • false reasons for adverse treatment given by the employer as a cover up of the real reason.

A common thread running through circumstantial evidence is the treatment of "comparators," or comparably situated other employees outside of the protected class. If an employer treats comparators the same as employees within the protected class, the employer has proof that it did not discriminate against the protected class, and vice versa. Mickey v. Zeidler Tool and Die Co., 516 F.3d 516, 521-22 (6th Cir. 2008). 

Pretext Evidence of Discrimination

In cases in which employees lack direct, statistical or even comparator evidence of discrimination, an unexplainable or false reason for an adverse employment action can tilt the burden of proof in the victim's favor. This happens as a result of the "burden shifting" process that the U.S. Supreme Court adopted to compensate for the fact that direct evidence of intentional discrimination is hard to come by. The burden shifting process forces the employer to explain its reasons for the adverse action, and allows the employee to attack the employer's stated reason as pretextual. If the employee proves that the employer stated a false reason as a cover up of the real reason, the jury can infer that the real reason is unlawful discrimination.

Proving that the employer's stated reasons are false permits an inference of unlawful discrimination because employers know better than anyone else the real reason for their actions. If employers lie and give a false reason, the jury can conclude that the reason the employer lied was to cover up an unlawful reason.

Damages in Discrimination Cases

An employee who proves unlawful discriminat is entitled to be placed in the position he or she would have been absent the discrimination. This can include lost wages, past and future, lost benefits, compensation for emotional pain and suffering and, in some cases, an award of attorneys' fees.

Lawyer Matches (101)

Palmer, Eric
3333
Oxnard, California

Herman, Charles
Charles Herman Law - Ohio Employment Law Attorney
Toledo, Ohio

Phillips, Bill
WE DEFEND YOUR RIGHTS IN THE WORKPLACE
New York, New York

Cunningham, Gerald
Federal Court Discimination cases
Atlanta, Georgia

Klingler, Robert A.
Cincinnati Employement Attorney
Cincinnati, Ohio

Glickman, Stephen
Aggressive, Responsive Chicago Employment Law Attorney with over 25 Years' Experience.
Chicago, Illinois

Asonye, Uche

Chicago, Illinois

Nirenberg, Jonathan
Dedicated to Enforcing Employee Rights
Upper Montclair, New Jersey

Jackson, Marcus
Plaintiff-side Employment Lawyer handling cases throughout Southern California.
Temecula, California

Rizzo, Albert
Experienced Employment Representation
New York, New York

Schofield, Arthur
Fighting for the Rights of Employees & Victims since 1993
West Palm Beach, Florida

Goldbach, Marc Aaron
Los Angeles County Premier Bankruptcy & Employment Lawyer
Whittier, California

Furton Jr., Joseph R.
Specializing in discrimination, overtime, whistleblower, and retaliations cases.
Dearborn, Michigan

Bernick, Kathy
Employment Law
Maria del Rey, California

Dayes III, Trey A.R.
Free Arizona Case Review- Call (800) 917-4000 Today!
Phoenix, Arizona

Tanner, James
Law Office of James Roscoe Tanner
Tampa, Florida

Gruben, Jill
We focus on: employment, contracts, defamation, business consulting
Malta, New York

Hennig, Rob
Attorneys for employees serving Los Angeles and surrounding areas; specializing in whistleblower, fr
Los Angeles, California

Hayber, Richard
Hartford Connecticut Employee Rights Attorney
Hartford, Connecticut

Sterns, Gerald
Successful Results In Complex Cases Since 1977
Oakland, California

Mertz, Andrea
Your vigorous advocate pursuing unscrupulous employers.
Wyomissing, Pennsylvania

Robaina, Edmundo
We represent employees in employment-related matters.
Phoenix, Arizona

Maul, Brian
Maryland Employment Law Attorney
Frederick, Maryland

Tsintolas, Suzanne
Experienced Employment Lawyer in DC & Maryland
Washington, District of Columbia

Leah, Scott
Employment law attorney representing both employers and employees in all areas of employment law
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Havens, Betsy
For Respect. For Fairness. For You.
Los Angeles, California

Prinz, Kristen
We help employees find advantage through adversity.
Chicago, Illinois

Hatzidakis, Christina
Providing employment advice and litigation
Chicago, Illinois

Cahill, Kathleen
Maryland Employment Attorney
Baltimore, Maryland

Sweat, Steven
Employment Law Attorneys Los Angeles CA
Los Angeles, California, United States, California

Barron, George
We Help Employees Fight Back!
Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania

Rooks, Franklin
Focus. Persistence. Success. We're Your Employment Lawyers.
Marlton, New Jersey

Gunter, Jason
Florida Employment Attorney
Fort Myers, Florida

Fortney, Michael
Employment Lawyer
Akron, Ohio

Goldman, Abraham

Oregon House, California

Sattiraju, Ravi
FIGHTING FOR WORKERS’ JUSTICE
Princeton, New Jersey

Goldsmith, Leizer
Outstanding Sexual Harassment and Employment Lawyers
Washington, District of Columbia

Wibbels, Joseph
Fighting for Employee Rights
Louisville, Kentucky

Covich, Daniel
Texas Employment Lawer
Corpus Christi, Texas

Carnes, William
Experienced Employment Law Counsel
Tampa, Florida

Gerber, Karl

Sherman Oaks, California

Katri, Raphael
California Labor & Employment Attorneys - Class Action Lawyers
Beverly Hills, California

Schneider, Daniel H.
Free Initial Consultation Available
Milford, Connecticut

Ballman, Donna

Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

Kazazian, Nina
Free short telephone consultation
Vail, Colorado

Kazazian, Nina

Denver, Colorado

McKinney, Christopher

San Antonio, Texas

Pastor, Patricia
New York Employment Lawyer
Northport, New York

Urba, V Jonas
One-on-one guidance for employees with employment issues.
Tarrytown, New York

Mann, Scott
Los Angeles Employment Lawyer
Los Angeles, California

Isaac, Kendall
Employment law attorney helping victims of discrimination retaliation and termination at work
Columbus, Ohio

Roush, Alfred
Aggressive, Smart, Practical, serving the State of Florida
Tampa, Florida

Mozaffari, Afshin
Los Angeles Employment Lawyer
Los Angeles, California

Crone, Alan

Memphis, Tennessee

Abramson, Andrew
Lawyers For Pennsylvania Employees
Blue Bell, Pennsylvania

Hardwick, Virginia
Employment Rights Advocate: Experience, Judgment, Commitment to Excellence
Doylestown, Pennsylvania

Hennessy, Brendan
Employment Attorney Philadelphia Malvern
Malvern, Pennsylvania

Azadian, George
Azadian Law Group, PC
Los Angeles, California

Gerber, Karl
Successfully Representing California Discrimination Victims Since 1993
Los Angeles, California

Miller, Judith

Newton, Massachusetts

Maduff, Aaron
A Nationally Recognized Employment Lawyer Licensed in More than 20 Jurisdictions
Chicago, Illinois

McKinney, Thomas
Experienced NJ Employment Lawyers focusing on Discrimination, Harassment, Overtime & Severance
Morristown, New Jersey

DeBrota, Amy
Experienced Employment Lawyer and Mediator
Carmel, Indiana

Goldner, Harold
Employment Lawyer with over 36 years of Employment Law Experience in State and Federal Courts
Blue Bell, Pennsylvania

Felahy, Allen
Bringing the fight to the other side for my clients.
Los Angeles, California

Tseng, Judy
Wage and Hour Act, sexual harassment, disparate treatment, wrongful termination, discrimination.
Cary, North Carolina

Schmidt, Robert
Fighting for Employee Rights
Austin, Texas

Barasch, Patricia
Employee Rights Advocates
Moorestown, New Jersey

Attardo, Loretta

Salem, Massachusetts

Molberg, Ken

Dallas, Texas

Henderson, Trey

Houston, Texas

A J Davies, Sebastian
Employment Attorney in the Los Angeles Area
San Marino, California

Azadian, George
Los Angeles Employment & Wrongful Termination Super Lawyers / Millions Recovered / No Cost To You
Pasadena, California

Rubin, Neil
Practical Legal Solutions--Responsive and Ethical--Appointments at your convenience
Twinsburg, Ohio

Okoronkwo, Chinyere
Employment Law Advocate
New York, New York

Hicks, Rick
YOU WORK HARD...WE WORK HARD TO PROTECT YOUR WORKPLACE RIGHTS
Beverly Hills, California

Kounoupis, George
A PREEMINENT EMPLOYMENT LAW FIRM
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania

Hersh, Barry

Dallas, Texas

Allen, George
Experienced Advocate for Employees
Sacramento, California

Carroll, Gay

Sacramento, California

Adams, Christine
Exclusively Practicing Employment Law in California
Santa Barbara, California

Knisbacher, Alden

San Francisco, California

Weinberg, Jill J.
Overtime claims, severance, non-compete & employment contracts
Dallas, Texas

Ezold, Christopher
Passionate advocate of parties in employment matters (noncompetition, discrimination, wages, etc.)
Bala Cynwyd & Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Enochs, Randy
Knowledgeable. Reliable. Affordable.
Glendale, Wisconsin

Case, Kristin
Founding Member of The Case Law Firm, LLC., a Chicago-based civil rights employment law firm.
Chicago, Illinois

Selby, Richard N.
Aggressive. Creative. Successful.
Painesville, Ohio

Royer, Christina
Experienced, Respected Employment Lawyer
Independence, Ohio

Pietrucha, Cynthia
Workplace Rights Advocate
Downers Grove, Illinois

Shishkin, Natalia
NJ/NY Employment Attorney
Morristown, New Jersey

Wagner, Lindsey
Employment Attorney
Jupiter, Florida

Fitzpatrick, Kate
Massachusetts - all locations. Virtual law practice. Strategic legal advice & counseling.
Boston, Massachusetts

Sedey, Kate
Partner at The Case Law Firm, LLC, a Chicago-based civil rights employment law firm.
Chicago, Illinois

Perotti, Patrick J.
Aggressive. Creative. Successful.
Painesville, Ohio

Wells, Samuel J.

Los Angeles, California

Klingshirn, Neil
AV rated Super Lawyer and Employment Law Specialist
Independence, Ohio

Spencer, Marilynn Mika
Representing working people and labor organizations in the fight for justice on the job
San Diego, California

Thomas, Archibald
Florida Law Firm Representing Employees only in all Labor & Employment related Matters
Jacksonville, Florida

Barna, Jim
A WEALTH OF EXPERIENCE FOR EMPLOYMENT LAW REPRESENTATION.
Syracuse, New York

Caffarelli, Alejandro
Employment Lawyer - Chicago, IL: FMLA, FLSA, unpaid wages & overtime, severance, whistleblower
Chicago, Illinois

Dettling, Rosemary
The Federal Employee Legal Services Center represents federal employees in EEOC and MSPB cases.
Washington, District of Columbia

Have an Employment Law question?

Virginia Employment Lawyers

Edward Lowry Edward Lowry
MichieHamlett
Charlottesville, VA
Matthew Sutter Matthew Sutter
Sutter & Terpak, PLLC
Annandale, VA
Gerald Lutkenhaus Gerald Lutkenhaus
Virginia Workers Compensation & Disability Lawyer
Richmond, VA
Sheri Abrams Sheri Abrams
Sheri R. Abrams PLLC
Oakton, VA

more Virginia Employment Lawyers