State Unemployment office is claiming I was paid for 30 hrs for a job I never took. Even if the business did send me a check, I never received any money or check...but the Unemployment office says I am responsible for THREE weeks of benefits to reimburse,

The State Unemployment Office is coming after me a YEAR later, claiming I had committed fraud. They claim a job had paid me for 30 hrs that I didn't claim...except I never worked for the job beyond the interview (Where I was informed of the hours and travel I couldn't manage). I never got any direct deposit or paper check, so I never claimed any income. The Unemployment Office is saying I owe them for THREE weeks of benefits to reimburse! Even if a check was sent out (That I had no knowledge of and received zero income from) it would only be for the one week on the log. They are claiming I owe for three weeks because "I could have been working those weeks."

Essentially, they are saying that even though I had received no income, I should have said I received income anyway to avoid being charged with fraud...in other words, I should have committed fraud, but in their favor.

0 answers  |  asked Sep 21, 2016 5:07 PM [EST]  |  applies to New Hampshire

Answers (0)

No answers were found for this question.

Answer This Question

Sign In to Answer this Question

Related Questions with Answers

Have an Employment Law question?