Is a long-standing unspoken practice be considered legally binding 'Implied-In-Fact" policy?
I am a teacher and for over 40 years my district has permitted (unspoken practice) teacher-children to be in the school building before and after school. The Board of education has now decided to ban teacher-children from the buildings before and after school. This coincides with the Board of Education verbally acknowledging their desire to remove the contract language allowing teachers to open enroll their child in the district. Can legal action be taken in this matter? Is the unspoken practice allowing teacher-children to be in the buildings before and after school considered a legally binding as an 'implied-in-fact' policy?
0 answers | asked Jul 16, 2020 11:13 AM [EST] | applies to Ohio
Answers (0)
No answers were found for this question.
Answer This Question